In re Scheier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Scheier

160 A.D. 873, 144 N.Y.S. 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D. 873 (In re Scheier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Scheier, 160 A.D. 873, 144 N.Y.S. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Order appealed from, canceling appellant’s notice of attorney’s lien in eminent domain proceeding, modified by striking therefrom in the recital of what was made to appear to the court the words “ that the services of the said William F. Burrough in this proceeding were of no value and,” and the words in the same sentence “or to any compensation herein,” and by inserting a clause to the effect that the order is without prejudice to the right of the attorney to bring an action, or actions to recover for his services in the proceeding, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Order appealed from, canceling appellant’s notice of attorney’s lien in eminent domain proceeding, modified by striking therefrom in the recital of what was made to appear to the court the words “ that the services of the said William F. Burrough in this proceeding were of no value and,” and the words in the same sentence “or to any compensation herein,” and by inserting a clause to the effect that the order is without prejudice to the right of the attorney to bring an action, or actions to recover for his services in the proceeding, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D. 873, 144 N.Y.S. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scheier-nyappdiv-1913.