In re Scheibel
This text of 192 A.D. 888 (In re Scheibel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Stewart avenue is asserted to have been closed at consolidation of the city of New York, through the effect of a map filed in 1874 by the town survey commission under Laws of 1869, chapter 670. However, section 5 of that act specifically excepts streets that have been or shall be authorized by special acts of the Legislature, “ in which cases such acts shall have full power and effect, anything in this act to the contrary notwithstanding.” Stewart avenue had been so authorized by Laws of 1843, chapter 47. Reargument is, therefore, directed on the question whether such map, at filing, or thereafter upon consolidation, could effect a closing of Stewart avenue. Such rehearing is accordingly set for Friday, the twenty-third, at ten a. m. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A.D. 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scheibel-nyappdiv-1920.