In re Schargel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Schargel

256 A.D. 814, 9 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4956

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 814 (In re Schargel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schargel, 256 A.D. 814, 9 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and petition dismissed. There is no proof that the petitioner was singled out and subjected to arbitrary restraints not imposed upon others. The record shows the petitioner to be a chronic violator of the department rules. On the facts disclosed it cannot be said that the commissioner abused his discretion. Present ■— O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, and petition dismissed. There is no proof that the petitioner was singled out and subjected to arbitrary restraints not imposed upon others. The record shows the petitioner to be a chronic violator of the department rules. On the facts disclosed it cannot be said that the commissioner abused his discretion. Present ■— O’Malley, Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 814, 9 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schargel-nyappdiv-1939.