In re Scharf

99 A.D.2d 150, 472 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16531

This text of 99 A.D.2d 150 (In re Scharf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Scharf, 99 A.D.2d 150, 472 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

opinion of the court

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 4,1962. By order of this court dated June 29,1981, he was suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years commencing August 1,1981. By further order of this court dated July 29,1981, the effective date of respondent’s suspension was extended to August 31, 1981.

On March 15, 1983 the respondent pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the second degree in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Grand larceny in the second degree is a class D felony (see Penal Law, § 155.35). On June 15,1983 respondent was sentenced to one year in the county jail. Execution of the sentence was stayed until June 21, 1983.

Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law in this State.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. Respondent is disbarred and the clerk of this court is directed to [151]*151strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Titone, Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.2d 150, 472 N.Y.S.2d 8, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scharf-nyappdiv-1984.