In re Schapiro

D. Maryland

In re Schapiro

286 F. 620, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1810

CourtDistrict Court, D. Maryland

DecidedJanuary 8, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 286 F. 620 (In re Schapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schapiro, 286 F. 620, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1810 (D. Md. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether a distraint, the warrant for which was issued before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, but which was not levied until afterwards, constitutes any lien upon the property. The question is really answered by In re Chaudron & Peyton (D. C.) 180 Fed. 841. The distraint, being the act of the landlord, does not affect anything until it is actually levied, and so soon as the petition in bankruptcy is filed, the right to distrain is ended.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether a distraint, the warrant for which was issued before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, but which was not levied until afterwards, constitutes any lien upon the property. The question is really answered by In re Chaudron & Peyton (D. C.) 180 Fed. 841. The distraint, being the act of the landlord, does not affect anything until it is actually levied, and so soon as the petition in bankruptcy is filed, the right to distrain is ended.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 F. 620, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schapiro-mdd-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack