In re Schambach

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Schambach

610 So. 2d 792, 1993 La. LEXIS 30, 1993 WL 3542

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 8, 1993

DocketNo. 92-B-3040

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 610 So. 2d 792 (In re Schambach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Schambach, 610 So. 2d 792, 1993 La. LEXIS 30, 1993 WL 3542 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations, the consent of the respondent, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of this court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Robert B. Schambach be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day from the finality of this decision. Upon Mr. Schambach’s reinstatement, he is to be placed on probation for two years, with the conditions of probation to be specified during the reinstatement process. Furthermore, respondent is ordered to pay all costs of these proceedings, as determined under [793]*793the provisions of Rule 7 of the Procedural Rules for the Disciplinary Board, as authorized by Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 10A(7).

SUSPENSION ORDERED

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations, the consent of the respondent, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of this court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Robert B. Schambach be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day from the finality of this decision. Upon Mr. Schambach’s reinstatement, he is to be placed on probation for two years, with the conditions of probation to be specified during the reinstatement process. Furthermore, respondent is ordered to pay all costs of these proceedings, as determined under [793]*793the provisions of Rule 7 of the Procedural Rules for the Disciplinary Board, as authorized by Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 10A(7).

SUSPENSION ORDERED

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

610 So. 2d 792, 1993 La. LEXIS 30, 1993 WL 3542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schambach-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack