In re Scanlan

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Scanlan

222 Ill. 2d 660

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 2007

DocketMR 21357

StatusPublished

This text of 222 Ill. 2d 660 (In re Scanlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Scanlan, 222 Ill. 2d 660 (Ill. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition, as amended, by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent John Francis Scanlan, who has been disciplined in the State of Wisconsin, is suspended from the practice of law for six months in the State of Illinois and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Wisconsin. Suspension effective February 2, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition, as amended, by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent John Francis Scanlan, who has been disciplined in the State of Wisconsin, is suspended from the practice of law for six months in the State of Illinois and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Wisconsin. Suspension effective February 2, 2007.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 Ill. 2d 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scanlan-ill-2007.