In re Saypol

666 A.2d 528, 142 N.J. 556, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1643
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 6, 1995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on September 29, 1995, concluding that ROBERT J. SAY-POL of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(d) [557] (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) by persuading an ethics grievant to sign a document releasing respondent from all charges against him, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT J. SAYPOL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Saypol, 666 A.2d 528, 142 N.J. 556, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1643 (N.J. 1995).

666 A.2d 528 (In re Saypol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.