In re Saypol

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Saypol

666 A.2d 528, 142 N.J. 556, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1643

DecidedNovember 6, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 666 A.2d 528 (In re Saypol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Saypol, 666 A.2d 528, 142 N.J. 556, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1643 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on September 29, 1995, concluding that ROBERT J. SAY-POL of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(d) [557]*557(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) by persuading an ethics grievant to sign a document releasing respondent from all charges against him, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT J. SAYPOL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on September 29, 1995, concluding that ROBERT J. SAY-POL of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(d) [557]*557(conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) by persuading an ethics grievant to sign a document releasing respondent from all charges against him, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT J. SAYPOL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

666 A.2d 528, 142 N.J. 556, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 1643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-saypol-nj-1995.