In re Sawyer

D. Massachusetts

In re Sawyer

130 F. 384, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts

DecidedMay 20, 1904

DocketNo. 8,027

StatusPublished

This text of 130 F. 384 (In re Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sawyer, 130 F. 384, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260 (D. Mass. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

EOWEEE, District Judge.

Adjudication September io, 1903. On May 11, 1903, the bankrupt gave a mortgage of personal property to Wyner to secure a debt of $1,500, payable in five installments in two, three, four, five, and six months, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent. By the decree of adjudication this mortgage was decided to have been given with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the bankrupt’s creditors. The referee has found that Wyner accepted the mortgage in good faith. The sum actually advanced by him to the bankrupt was $1,310. Of the balance of $190 included in the mortgage note, Wyner testified that $90 was added by way' of interest for six months at the rate of 12 per cent, and $100 as a bonus. He further testified that no other interest was payable on the note. The referee was of opinion that Wyner’s claim was good only for $1,310, with interest at 6 per cent., and ordered him to pay the balance arising from the foreclosure sale to the trustee. Twelve per cent, interest and a bonus of $100 are not terms so unconscionable as to justify a court of equity in setting aside a mortgage for inadequacy of consideration. Wyner may be able to prove as creditor for $1,500. Wé are here considering, not the validity of the debt as against the bankrupt and his estate, but the validity of the creditor’s security as against other creditors. Section 67c of the Bankrupt Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 564 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3449]) is much stricter than the rule in equity. It requires, for the validity of a mortgage given within four months of bankruptcy, “a present fair consideration.” Where the security is taken for a loan of money, the present fair consideration cannot ordinarily be greater than the sum of money lent — in this case $1,310, with interest. The $90 cannot be [385]*385treated as a discount of interest at 12 per cent., because the note provides for payment in five installments, and, even at the rate of 12 per cent., the discount of $90 was excessive.

Judgment of the referee affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EOWEEE, District Judge.

Adjudication September io, 1903. On May 11, 1903, the bankrupt gave a mortgage of personal property to Wyner to secure a debt of $1,500, payable in five installments in two, three, four, five, and six months, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent. By the decree of adjudication this mortgage was decided to have been given with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the bankrupt’s creditors. The referee has found that Wyner accepted the mortgage in good faith. The sum actually advanced by him to the bankrupt was $1,310. Of the balance of $190 included in the mortgage note, Wyner testified that $90 was added by way' of interest for six months at the rate of 12 per cent, and $100 as a bonus. He further testified that no other interest was payable on the note. The referee was of opinion that Wyner’s claim was good only for $1,310, with interest at 6 per cent., and ordered him to pay the balance arising from the foreclosure sale to the trustee. Twelve per cent, interest and a bonus of $100 are not terms so unconscionable as to justify a court of equity in setting aside a mortgage for inadequacy of consideration. Wyner may be able to prove as creditor for $1,500. Wé are here considering, not the validity of the debt as against the bankrupt and his estate, but the validity of the creditor’s security as against other creditors. Section 67c of the Bankrupt Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 564 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3449]) is much stricter than the rule in equity. It requires, for the validity of a mortgage given within four months of bankruptcy, “a present fair consideration.” Where the security is taken for a loan of money, the present fair consideration cannot ordinarily be greater than the sum of money lent — in this case $1,310, with interest. The $90 cannot be [385]*385treated as a discount of interest at 12 per cent., because the note provides for payment in five installments, and, even at the rate of 12 per cent., the discount of $90 was excessive.

Judgment of the referee affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 F. 384, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sawyer-mad-1904.