In re Sawyer
This text of 332 F. App'x 888 (In re Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[889]*889Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Robert Sawyer petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that on April 8, 2009, 2009 WL 960687, the district court filed a memorandum opinion and entered an order denying the § 2255 motion and dismissing with prejudice. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Sawyer’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sawyer-ca4-2009.