In re Savannah D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Savannah D.

77 A.D.3d 750, 908 N.Y.S.2d 606

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 A.D.3d 750 (In re Savannah D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Savannah D., 77 A.D.3d 750, 908 N.Y.S.2d 606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated July 8, 2009, which, after a violation hearing, revoked a suspended judgment dated February 2, 2009, upon a determination that she violated the terms and conditions thereof and, after a dispositional hearing, terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the mother violated the terms of the suspended judgment (see Matter of Amber AA., 301 AD2d 694 [2003]; Matter of Jonathan P., 283 AD2d 675, 676 [2001]; Matter of Kaleb U., 280 AD2d 710, 712 [2001]). Moreover, the Family Court properly determined that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Shawna DD., 289 AD2d 892, 894 [2001]; Matter of Kenneth A., 206 AD2d 602, 604 [1994]). Covello, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated July 8, 2009, which, after a violation hearing, revoked a suspended judgment dated February 2, 2009, upon a determination that she violated the terms and conditions thereof and, after a dispositional hearing, terminated her parental rights.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the mother violated the terms of the suspended judgment (see Matter of Amber AA., 301 AD2d 694 [2003]; Matter of Jonathan P., 283 AD2d 675, 676 [2001]; Matter of Kaleb U., 280 AD2d 710, 712 [2001]). Moreover, the Family Court properly determined that termination of the mother’s parental rights was in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Shawna DD., 289 AD2d 892, 894 [2001]; Matter of Kenneth A., 206 AD2d 602, 604 [1994]). Covello, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.3d 750, 908 N.Y.S.2d 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-savannah-d-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack