Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Satta

In re Satta

95 A.D.2d 673, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18570
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Satta. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 A.D.2d 442 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Motion for reinstatement referred to the petitioner for the sole purpose of hearing and reporting to this court on the question of whether respondent has fully recovered from his incapacitation to practice law and, pending receipt of said report, determination of the motion is held in abeyance. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Satta, 95 A.D.2d 673, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

95 A.D.2d 673 (In re Satta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.