In Re Sasha Perez v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 4, 2024
Docket13-23-00538-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Sasha Perez v. the State of Texas (In Re Sasha Perez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Sasha Perez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-23-00538-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

IN RE SASHA PEREZ ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant Neutron Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Lime filed an interlocutory appeal on

November 28, 2023, in this Court challenging the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel

arbitration. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal

because appellee Sasha Perez has filed a notice of nonsuit in the trial court making this

appeal moot. See Lensing v. Card, 417 S.W.3d 152, 155 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013, no

pet.) (providing that a notice of nonsuit in the trial court renders a pending interlocutory

appeal moot). The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

dismissed. Costs will be taxed against each party incurring same as requested by

appellant and agreed-to by appellee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of

the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal

at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 4th day of January, 2024.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wayne Lensing and Lefhander Marketing, Inc. v. David Card and Cleo Lowe
417 S.W.3d 152 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Sasha Perez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sasha-perez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.