In re Sarna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sarna

216 A.D.2d 621, 627 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 621 (In re Sarna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sarna, 216 A.D.2d 621, 627 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 27, 1994, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a legal secretary, left her employment with a large New York City law firm upon being offered a retirement incentive package. Since the evidence is undisputed that claimant left her employment for this reason, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 5, 1994, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not available for employment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 27, 1994, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a legal secretary, left her employment with a large New York City law firm upon being offered a retirement incentive package. Since the evidence is undisputed that claimant left her employment for this reason, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 5, 1994, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not available for employment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 621, 627 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sarna-nyappdiv-1995.