In re Sargen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sargen

220 A.D.2d 57, 642 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5759

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 220 A.D.2d 57 (In re Sargen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sargen, 220 A.D.2d 57, 642 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12,1973 and is currently in good standing. She has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept her resignation from the practice of law in New York State. In her affidavit, she states that she resides in Pennsylvania, that she currently does not practice law, and that she is resigning because she no longer wishes to maintain her attorney registration in this State. There are no complaints pending against her.

[58]*58We grant the application and direct that her name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur. Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on September 12,1973 and is currently in good standing. She has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept her resignation from the practice of law in New York State. In her affidavit, she states that she resides in Pennsylvania, that she currently does not practice law, and that she is resigning because she no longer wishes to maintain her attorney registration in this State. There are no complaints pending against her.

[58]*58We grant the application and direct that her name be removed from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ., concur. Resignation accepted, and name removed from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 A.D.2d 57, 642 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sargen-nyappdiv-1996.