In re Sarah WW.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sarah WW.

122 A.D.2d 449, 505 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 449 (In re Sarah WW.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sarah WW., 122 A.D.2d 449, 505 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court of Schoharie County (Lamont, J.), entered October 25, 1984, which granted petitioner’s applications, in two proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate Sarah WW. and Christine XX., inter alia, permanently neglected children, and terminated respondents’ parental rights, and (2) from an order of said court, entered October 25, 1984, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to adjudicate Kenneth XX., Jr., a neglected child.

Order in appeal No. 1 affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Family Court Judge Dan Lamont.

Order in appeal No. 2 affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court of Schoharie County (Lamont, J.), entered October 25, 1984, which granted petitioner’s applications, in two proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate Sarah WW. and Christine XX., inter alia, permanently neglected children, and terminated respondents’ parental rights, and (2) from an order of said court, entered October 25, 1984, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, to adjudicate Kenneth XX., Jr., a neglected child.

Order in appeal No. 1 affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Family Court Judge Dan Lamont.

Order in appeal No. 2 affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 449, 505 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sarah-ww-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack