In re Sarah A.
113 A.D.3d 845, 978 N.Y.2d 909
Opinion
The order appealed from did not decide that branch of the father’s motion which was to prohibit the mother from moving into the paternal grandmother’s home with the subject children. The father’s contentions concerning that branch of the motion are therefore not properly before us, as that branch of the motion remains pending and undecided (see Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536 [1979]; see also CPLR 5511). Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Sarah A., 113 A.D.3d 845, 978 N.Y.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 845 (In re Sarah A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Katz v. Katz
68 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)