in Re: Sara Matula
This text of in Re: Sara Matula (in Re: Sara Matula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00449-CV
IN RE SARA MATULA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 18, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Georgia Dempster, presiding judge of the 308th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her ruling granting the real parties in interest visitation with relator=s minor child through the SAFE program.
Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Specifically, relator has waived her claim by acquiescing to the trial court=s ruling. See e.g. Simmons v. Kuzmich, 166 S.W.3d 342, 351 (Tex. App.BFort Worth 2005, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Yates, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Sara Matula, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sara-matula-texapp-2006.