In re Santiago

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Santiago

889 A.2d 1058, 185 N.J. 605, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 18

DecidedJanuary 26, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1058 (In re Santiago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Santiago, 889 A.2d 1058, 185 N.J. 605, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 18 (N.J. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that EMILIO SANTIAGO of CLIFTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective March 28, 2003, by Order of this Court filed on February 28, 2003, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that EMILIO SANTIAGO of CLIFTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, and who was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months effective March 28, 2003, by Order of this Court filed on February 28, 2003, be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years and until the further Order of the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

889 A.2d 1058, 185 N.J. 605, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-santiago-nj-2006.