In re Sangiamo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Sangiamo

774 A.2d 731

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 12, 2001

DocketNo. 652 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 774 A.2d 731 (In re Sangiamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sangiamo, 774 A.2d 731 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2001, a Rule having been entered by this Court on February 5, 2001, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Tony Santo Sangiamo to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Tony Santo Sangiamo is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2001, a Rule having been entered by this Court on February 5, 2001, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Tony Santo Sangiamo to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Tony Santo Sangiamo is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

774 A.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sangiamo-pa-2001.