In Re Sang Su Lee
Opinion
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1191 (Serial No. 07/631,240)
IN RE SANG SU LEE
Robert E. Bushnell, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Richard H. Stern.
Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Raymond T. Chen, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Sydney O. Johnson, Jr., Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
JUDGMENT
ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
In CASE NO(S). Serial No. 07/631,240
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: January 22, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Sang Su Lee (In Re Sang Su Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.