In re Sang Kyu Hwang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sang Kyu Hwang

107 A.D.3d 1294, 967 N.Y.S.2d 497

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.3d 1294 (In re Sang Kyu Hwang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sang Kyu Hwang, 107 A.D.3d 1294, 967 N.Y.S.2d 497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2007. He maintains a business address in Seoul, South Korea.

Respondent has failed to comply with a subpoena duces tecum which directed him to appear on March 1, 2013 for an examination under oath by petitioner and to produce records relevant to petitioner’s investigation of an inquiry against him. Respondent has further failed to reply to petitioner’s instant motion to suspend him from the practice of law, pending his full compliance with the subpoena (see 22 NYCRR 806.4 [b]). Under the circumstances, we grant petitioner’s motion, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, pending respondent’s full compliance with the subpoena and until further order of this Court (see e.g. Matter of Anderson, 77 AD3d 1277 [2010]; Matter of McCormick, 75 AD3d 1049 [2010]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2007. He maintains a business address in Seoul, South Korea.

Respondent has failed to comply with a subpoena duces tecum which directed him to appear on March 1, 2013 for an examination under oath by petitioner and to produce records relevant to petitioner’s investigation of an inquiry against him. Respondent has further failed to reply to petitioner’s instant motion to suspend him from the practice of law, pending his full compliance with the subpoena (see 22 NYCRR 806.4 [b]). Under the circumstances, we grant petitioner’s motion, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, pending respondent’s full compliance with the subpoena and until further order of this Court (see e.g. Matter of Anderson, 77 AD3d 1277 [2010]; Matter of McCormick, 75 AD3d 1049 [2010]).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.3d 1294, 967 N.Y.S.2d 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sang-kyu-hwang-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack