In re Sands

E.D. New York

In re Sands

21 F. Cas. 332, 7 Ben. 19

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided September 15, 1873·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

Under the provisions of section 13 of the act, Mr. Savary was not in default until the expiration of a time required to be specified in an order to be made requiring the giving of the bond; and, after such default, Mr. Savary’s removal from office ivas necessary before another assignee could be appointed in his place. It is not stated that any such provision was contained in any order, or that Mr. Savary was removed from office. There must, therefore, be other and further proceedings in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

Under the provisions of section 13 of the act, Mr. Savary was not in default until the expiration of a time required to be specified in an order to be made requiring the giving of the bond; and, after such default, Mr. Savary’s removal from office ivas necessary before another assignee could be appointed in his place. It is not stated that any such provision was contained in any order, or that Mr. Savary was removed from office. There must, therefore, be other and further proceedings in the case.

In re Sands, 21 F. Cas. 332, 7 Ben. 19 (E.D.N.Y. 1873).

Pincite

21 F. Cas. 332 (In re Sands) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.