In re Sands

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sands

189 A.D.2d 269, 598 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 189 A.D.2d 269 (In re Sands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sands, 189 A.D.2d 269, 598 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 28, 1974 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of Arizona where he was admitted to practice and is now employed, that he has no intention of returning to practice in this State, and that he is resigning because he no longer [270]*270wishes to maintain his attorney registration in New York. There are no complaints pending against him.

Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The above-named attorney was admitted to practice by this Court on February 28, 1974 and is currently in good standing. He has submitted an affidavit requesting that this Court accept his resignation from the practice of law in New York State. His affidavit states that he has relocated to the State of Arizona where he was admitted to practice and is now employed, that he has no intention of returning to practice in this State, and that he is resigning because he no longer [270]*270wishes to maintain his attorney registration in New York. There are no complaints pending against him.

Accordingly, we grant the application and direct that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Denman, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ., concur.

Resignation accepted and name stricken from roll of attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 A.D.2d 269, 598 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sands-nyappdiv-1993.