in Re: Sandra Crenshaw
Opinion
DENIED; Opinion Filed August 29, 2019.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00979-CV
IN RE SANDRA CRENSHAW, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-03187-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Nowell
Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the Dallas
County Local Administrative Judge has refused to rule on her request for a prefiling order allowing
her to proceed with a petition in the justice court.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show that the trial court has clearly abused
its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and
mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a)(the court must deny the petition if court determines relator is not entitled to relief sought).
/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
190979F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Sandra Crenshaw (in Re: Sandra Crenshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.