in Re: Sandra Crenshaw

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 29, 2019·No. 05-19-00979-CV·Published

Opinion

DENIED; Opinion Filed August 29, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00979-CV

IN RE SANDRA CRENSHAW, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-03187-H

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Nowell

Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the Dallas

County Local Administrative Judge has refused to rule on her request for a prefiling order allowing

her to proceed with a petition in the justice court.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show that the trial court has clearly abused

its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am.,

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and

mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a)(the court must deny the petition if court determines relator is not entitled to relief sought).

/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

190979F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Sandra Crenshaw, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re: Sandra Crenshaw (in Re: Sandra Crenshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)