In re Sandler

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Sandler

588 N.E.2d 779, 63 Ohio St. 3d 372, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 624

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1992·No. No. 91-2318·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s license to practice law is immediately revoked. Applicant may reapply for admission, provided that he (1) undergoes another character and fitness exam in which he successfully demonstrates his character, fitness and moral qualifications to practice law, and (2) successfully retakes the Ohio Bar Examination, no sooner than February 1995.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s license to practice law is immediately revoked. Applicant may reapply for admission, provided that he (1) undergoes another character and fitness exam in which he successfully demonstrates his character, fitness and moral qualifications to practice law, and (2) successfully retakes the Ohio Bar Examination, no sooner than February 1995.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

In re Sandler, 588 N.E.2d 779, 63 Ohio St. 3d 372, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 624 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

588 N.E.2d 779 (In re Sandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related