In re Sandler

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Sandler

588 N.E.2d 779, 63 Ohio St. 3d 372, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 624

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 8, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2318

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 588 N.E.2d 779 (In re Sandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sandler, 588 N.E.2d 779, 63 Ohio St. 3d 372, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 624 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s license to practice law is immediately revoked. Applicant may reapply for admission, provided that he (1) undergoes another character and fitness exam in which he successfully demonstrates his character, fitness and moral qualifications to practice law, and (2) successfully retakes the Ohio Bar Examination, no sooner than February 1995.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Accordingly, applicant’s license to practice law is immediately revoked. Applicant may reapply for admission, provided that he (1) undergoes another character and fitness exam in which he successfully demonstrates his character, fitness and moral qualifications to practice law, and (2) successfully retakes the Ohio Bar Examination, no sooner than February 1995.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

588 N.E.2d 779, 63 Ohio St. 3d 372, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sandler-ohio-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack