In re Sanborn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sanborn

152 A.D. 935, 137 N.Y.S. 1141

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1912·Published

Opinion

The practice of using, even temporarily and with purpose of immediate repayment, the money of a client by his lawyer, without authority, is condemned, and has in the present instance resulted in painful consequences to respondent. But in view of his usual good professional conduct, it is unnecessary to proceed farther in matter of discipline. Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The practice of using, even temporarily and with purpose of immediate repayment, the money of a client by his lawyer, without authority, is condemned, and has in the present instance resulted in painful consequences to respondent. But in view of his usual good professional conduct, it is unnecessary to proceed farther in matter of discipline. Hirschberg, Burr, Thomas, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.

In re Sanborn, 152 A.D. 935, 137 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

152 A.D. 935 (In re Sanborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.