In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co.

111 F. 892, 50 C.C.A. 56, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4444
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 1901
DocketNo. 573
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 111 F. 892 (In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co., 111 F. 892, 50 C.C.A. 56, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4444 (9th Cir. 1901).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the district court for the Southern district of California granted leave to a mortgagee to make a trustee in bankruptcy a party defendant to foreclosure proceedings in the state court. The court also denied the petition of the trustee for an injunction to restrain the foreclosure proceedings in the state court. On a petition to this court for a review of the proceedings in the district court, the orders were reversed'. In re San Gabriel Sanatorium Co., 42 C. C. A. 369, 102 Fed. 310. Before further proceedings were taken in the district court the supreme court of the United States decided the case of Bardes v. Bank, 178 U. S. 524, 20 Sup. Ct. 1000, 44 L. Ed. 1175. A rehearing was thereupon granted in this case. [893]*893Under the construction placed upon the bankrupt act by the supreme court, the district court was right in granting leave to the mortgagee to make the trustee in bankruptcy a party defendant to_ the foreclosure proceedings in the state court. It was also right in denying the petition of the trustee for an injunction to restrain the foreclosure proceedings in the state court.

The orders of the district court are therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michelle Merceri v. Deutsche Bank Ag A/k/a
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2018
Duncan v. Fox
300 F. 165 (S.D. Florida, 1924)
Ft. Dearborn Trust & Savings Bank v. Smalley
298 F. 45 (Eighth Circuit, 1924)
In re Detroit Waterproof Fabric Co.
295 F. 338 (E.D. Michigan, 1924)
In re Dayton Coal & Iron Co.
291 F. 390 (E.D. Tennessee, 1922)
In re Solomon
294 F. 295 (M.D. Alabama, 1922)
McDermott v. Tolt Land Co.
172 P. 207 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
In re Zehner
193 F. 787 (E.D. Louisiana, 1912)
In re Platteville Foundry & Machine Co.
147 F. 828 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1906)
In re Johnson
127 F. 618 (D. Nevada, 1904)
In re Kellogg
113 F. 120 (W.D. New York, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 F. 892, 50 C.C.A. 56, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-san-gabriel-sanatorium-co-ca9-1901.