In re Samuels

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Samuels

639 N.E.2d 1151, 70 Ohio St. 3d 537

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 19, 1994·No. No. 94-977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Samuels’s application for registration as a candidate for admission to the practice of law in Ohio is disapproved. He may not reapply until necessary to become eligible to take the July 1996 bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings and recommendation. Samuels’s application for registration as a candidate for admission to the practice of law in Ohio is disapproved. He may not reapply until necessary to become eligible to take the July 1996 bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

In re Samuels, 639 N.E.2d 1151, 70 Ohio St. 3d 537 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

639 N.E.2d 1151 (In re Samuels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related