In Re Samuel Roy Jackson v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Samuel Roy Jackson v. the State of Texas (In Re Samuel Roy Jackson v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 20, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00069-CR NO. 01-25-00070-CR ——————————— IN RE SAMUEL ROY JACKSON, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Samuel Roy Jackson, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
requesting that this Court compel the Harris County District Attorney to “disclose
all exculpatory evidence material documents filed under cause number 913043 and
cause number 952420.”1
1 The underlying cases are The State of Texas v. Samuel Roy Jackson, cause numbers 913043 and 952420 in the 183rd District Court of Harris County. This Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a
district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of
appeals district.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). We lack authority to issue a writ of
mandamus against other parties unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See
TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a) (“Each court of appeals or a justice of a court of
appeals may issue a writ of mandamus and all other writs necessary to enforce the
jurisdiction of the court.”). Relator’s requested mandamus relief is not against a
judge and does not involve enforcing the appellate jurisdiction of this Court.
Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the Harris
County District Attorney. See In re Cole, No. 01-20-00807-CR, 2021 WL 243894,
at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 26, 2021, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.,
not designated for publication).
Because we lack jurisdiction to grant the relief requested, we deny the
mandamus petition.2
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2 Relator’s petition also fails to comply with the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (form and content requirements); 52.7(a) (record requirements). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Samuel Roy Jackson v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-samuel-roy-jackson-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.