in Re Samuel Espinoza
This text of in Re Samuel Espinoza (in Re Samuel Espinoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 22, 2014
No. 04-14-00891-CR
IN RE Samuel ESPINOZA
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On December 19, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s request for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on December 22, 2014.
_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of December, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 5924, styled The State of Texas v. Samuel Espinoza, pending in the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas, the Honorable Ana Lisa Garza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Samuel Espinoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-samuel-espinoza-texapp-2014.