in Re Samuel Adkins

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
Docket03-19-00004-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Samuel Adkins (in Re Samuel Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Samuel Adkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00004-CV

In re Samuel Adkins

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Samuel Adkins filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court

to compel the district court to act on his motion for forensic DNA testing and his motion for

appointment of counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.01(a-1), (c). After Adkins filed his

petition, the district court ruled on both of his motions. Accordingly, we dismiss Adkins’s petition

for writ of mandamus as moot. See In re Luna, 317 S.W.3d 484, 484 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2010,

orig. proceeding); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).1

_________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed as Moot

Filed: January 29, 2019

1 The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides for appeals involving chapter 64 forensic DNA testing as in any other criminal matter. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.05; see Tex. R. App. P. 26.2, 26.3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Luna
317 S.W.3d 484 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Samuel Adkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-samuel-adkins-texapp-2019.