in Re Samuel Adkins

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 29, 2019·No. 03-19-00004-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00004-CV

In re Samuel Adkins

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Samuel Adkins filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to compel the district court to act on his motion for forensic DNA testing and his motion for appointment of counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.01(a-1), (c). After Adkins filed his petition, the district court ruled on both of his motions. Accordingly, we dismiss Adkins’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See In re Luna, 317 S.W.3d 484, 484 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2010, orig. proceeding); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).1

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana Dismissed as Moot Filed: January 29, 2019

1 The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides for appeals involving chapter 64 forensic DNA testing as in any other criminal matter. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 64.05; see Tex. R. App. P. 26.2, 26.3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Samuel Adkins, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re Samuel Adkins (in Re Samuel Adkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Luna
317 S.W.3d 484 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)