In re Sammie C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sammie C.

22 A.D.3d 234, 802 N.Y.S.2d 116

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.3d 234 (In re Sammie C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sammie C., 22 A.D.3d 234, 802 N.Y.S.2d 116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about March 5, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and assault in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The victim made a prompt and reliable identification. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about March 5, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and assault in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The victim made a prompt and reliable identification. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.3d 234, 802 N.Y.S.2d 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sammie-c-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack