in Re: Sameena Ahmed

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 3, 2005
• Docket: 13-05-00348-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

                              NUMBER 13-05-348-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

                                          IN RE: SAMEENA AHMED

                               On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

                              Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION                                   

                          Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On May 31, 2005, relator, Sameena Ahmed, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court in which she alleges that on May 10, 2005, the respondent, the Honorable Rodolfo ARudy@ Gonzalez, Presiding Judge of the County Court at Law No. 1, abused his discretion by ordering relator to an open-ended psychiatric examination on June 2, 2005.  Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to order the respondent to vacate the May 10, 2005 letter order.  In addition, relator filed a motion for emergency relief, asking this Court to order a stay of the May 10, 2005 letter order.  This Court stayed all proceedings in the underlying action and requested a response from the real party in interest.  The real party in interest, Shahid Rashid, filed his response to the petition for writ of mandamus on July 11, 2005.  The relator filed a reply to that response on July 13, 2005.              Having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, real party in interest=s response, and relator=s reply to response, this Court denies the petition and lifts the stay granted on relator=s emergency motion.  The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 3rd day of August, 2005.