In Re Samantha S.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

In Re Samantha S.

995 A.2d 955, 297 Conn. 913, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 235

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 2010·No. SC 18628·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the respondent father for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 755 (AC 30197), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the record in the present case was not adequate for review?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*914 David B. Rozwaski, in support of the petition. Tammy Nguyen-ODowd, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided June 15, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the respondent father for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 120 Conn. App. 755 (AC 30197), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the record in the present case was not adequate for review?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

*914 David B. Rozwaski, in support of the petition. Tammy Nguyen-ODowd, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided June 15, 2010

In Re Samantha S., 995 A.2d 955, 297 Conn. 913, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 235 (Colo. 2010).

Pincite

995 A.2d 955 (In Re Samantha S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related