In Re Samantha Hale Battenfield v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Samantha Hale Battenfield v. the State of Texas (In Re Samantha Hale Battenfield v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas
JUDGMENT
In re Samantha Hale Battenfield Original Mandamus Proceeding
No. 06-24-00090-CV Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Rambin.
As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the Relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted, and we direct the trial court to withdraw, within fourteen days of the date our opinion issues, its October 2, 2024, order striking Relator’s petition in intervention and dismissing the case. The writ of mandamus will issue only if the trial court fails to comply.
RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2025 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE
ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Samantha Hale Battenfield v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-samantha-hale-battenfield-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.