in Re Sam Edward Draper and Elsie Martin-Simon
This text of in Re Sam Edward Draper and Elsie Martin-Simon (in Re Sam Edward Draper and Elsie Martin-Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 28, 2014
No. 04-14-00522-CV
IN RE Sam Edward DRAPER and Elsie Martin-Simon
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
On July 25, 2014, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relators’ petition and is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on July 28th, 2014.
_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of July, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12724B, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Julie A. Mogenis and Sam Edward Draper, pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas, the Honorable Rex Emerson presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Sam Edward Draper and Elsie Martin-Simon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sam-edward-draper-and-elsie-martin-simon-texapp-2014.