In re Salsbury

N.D. New York

In re Salsbury

113 F. 833, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 381

District Court, N.D. New York·Decided February 10, 1902·No. No. 232·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

I have read the report of the referee and have examined the papers submitted. I agree with the referee that the objections to the discharge have not. been established. The questions discussed have heretofore been decided by me in analogous circumstances. In addition to the cases cited by the referee the attention of counsel is called to the following: In re Howden (D. C.) 111 Fed. 723; In re Eaton (D. C.) 110 Fed. 731. In these cases the objections principally relied on by the objecting creditor were considered, upon somewhat similar facts, and disposed of adversely to the creditor’s contention.

The report is confirmed and the discharge is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, District Judge.

I have read the report of the referee and have examined the papers submitted. I agree with the referee that the objections to the discharge have not. been established. The questions discussed have heretofore been decided by me in analogous circumstances. In addition to the cases cited by the referee the attention of counsel is called to the following: In re Howden (D. C.) 111 Fed. 723; In re Eaton (D. C.) 110 Fed. 731. In these cases the objections principally relied on by the objecting creditor were considered, upon somewhat similar facts, and disposed of adversely to the creditor’s contention.

The report is confirmed and the discharge is granted.

In re Salsbury, 113 F. 833, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 381 (N.D.N.Y. 1902).

Pincite

113 F. 833 (In re Salsbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related