Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Salisbury

In re Salisbury

632 N.E.2d 1288, 69 Ohio St. 3d 403
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 8, 1994
DocketNo. 93-2173
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 632 N.E.2d 1288 (In re Salisbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Salisbury, 632 N.E.2d 1288, 69 Ohio St. 3d 403 (Ohio 1994).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s finding and its recommendation. Accordingly, we order that Elizabeth A. Salisbury be suspended for an indefinite period from the practice of law in Ohio. This suspension is to terminate upon a showing of her compliance with the condition set by the board, followed by further review by the board of her character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Panepinto
704 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
632 N.E.2d 1288, 69 Ohio St. 3d 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-salisbury-ohio-1994.