In re Salisbury

632 N.E.2d 1288, 69 Ohio St. 3d 403
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 1994·No. No. 93-2173·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s finding and its recommendation. Accordingly, we order that Elizabeth A. Salisbury be suspended for an indefinite period from the practice of law in Ohio. This suspension is to terminate upon a showing of her compliance with the condition set by the board, followed by further review by the board of her character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Salisbury, 632 N.E.2d 1288, 69 Ohio St. 3d 403 (Ohio 1994).

632 N.E.2d 1288 (In re Salisbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Panepinto
704 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)