In re Salimata T.

113 A.D.3d 532, 978 N.Y.2d 849

This text of 113 A.D.3d 532 (In re Salimata T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Salimata T., 113 A.D.3d 532, 978 N.Y.2d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

The Family Court’s neglect finding, based upon allegations of the mother’s infliction of excessive corporal punishment, was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Deivi R. [Marcos R.], 68 AD3d 498 [1st Dept 2009]). The daughter’s out-of-court statements describing various instances of excessive corporal punishment were properly admitted into evidence, since they were corroborated by her brother’s statements, as well as the daughter’s teacher, guidance counselor, and the ACS caseworker’s observations of her injuries (see Matter of Naomi J. [Damon R.], 84 AD3d 594 [1st Dept 2011]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Andrias, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Deivi R.
68 A.D.3d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Naomi J.
84 A.D.3d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 532, 978 N.Y.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-salimata-t-nyappdiv-2014.