In Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. Terry Newman Judy Newman, in Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. Bernard G. Boston Carol A. Boston, in Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. David Victor Ward

199 F.3d 1375, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 628, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 993, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 915
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 26, 2000
Docket98-56051
StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.3d 1375 (In Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. Terry Newman Judy Newman, in Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. Bernard G. Boston Carol A. Boston, in Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. David Victor Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. Terry Newman Judy Newman, in Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. Bernard G. Boston Carol A. Boston, in Re Sale Guaranty Corporation, Debtor. Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee v. David Victor Ward, 199 F.3d 1375, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 628, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 993, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 915 (9th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

199 F.3d 1375 (9th Cir. 2000)

In Re SALE GUARANTY CORPORATION, Debtor.
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
TERRY NEWMAN; JUDY NEWMAN, Appellees.
In Re SALE GUARANTY CORPORATION, Debtor.
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
BERNARD G. BOSTON; CAROL A. BOSTON, Appellees. In Re SALE GUARANTY CORPORATION, Debtor.
ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee, Appellant,
v.
DAVID VICTOR WARD, Appellee.

No. 98-56051 No. 98-56071 No. 98-56074

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted December 6, 1999--Pasadena, California

Filed January 26, 2000

Appeals from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Carlson, Hagan & Brandt, Judges, Presiding

BAP No. CC-97-01616-CaHaBr BAP No. CC-97-01493-CaHaBr BAP No. CC-97-01494-CaHaBr

Before: Melvin Brunetti and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,1 Senior District Judge.

COUNSEL: David R. Weinstein, Weinstein, Eisen & Levine, Los Angeles, California, for the appellant. Edwin J. Rambuski, San Luis Obispo, California and Thomas M. Hinshaw, Michaelson, Susi & Michaelson, Santa Barbara, California, for the appellees.

ORDER

We affirm the judgments of the bankruptcy court for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel filed on April 22, 1998, and published at 220 B.R. 660 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.

Notes:

1

The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siegel v. Boston (In Re Sale Guaranty Corp.)
220 B.R. 660 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 F.3d 1375, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 628, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 993, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sale-guaranty-corporation-debtor-alfred-h-siegel-trustee-v-terry-ca9-2000.