in Re Salatiel Polanco D/B/A D&C Trucking
This text of in Re Salatiel Polanco D/B/A D&C Trucking (in Re Salatiel Polanco D/B/A D&C Trucking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 12, 2016
No. 04-16-00660-CV
IN RE Salatiel POLANCO d/b/a D&C Trucking
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
On October 10, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than October 24, 2016. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
It is so ORDERED on October 12, 2016.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _______________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14-12-30420-MCV, styled Margarita Trevino et al v. Salatiel Polanco d/b/a D&C Trucking, et al, pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Salatiel Polanco D/B/A D&C Trucking, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-salatiel-polanco-dba-dc-trucking-texapp-2016.