In re Salat
768 So. 2d 31, 2000 La. LEXIS 2538, 2000 WL 1396418
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 22, 2000
DocketNo. 2000-B-1814
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 768 So. 2d 31 (In re Salat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Salat, 768 So. 2d 31, 2000 La. LEXIS 2538, 2000 WL 1396418 (La. 2000).
Opinion
In re Salat, Syed Alim; — Plaintiff; Applying for Reinstatement Office Of The Disciplinary Board, No. 99-BD-037.
Readmission denied. Petitioner may not reapply for readmission until restitution has been made, but in no event until after one year has passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Salat
131 So. 3d 841 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
768 So. 2d 31, 2000 La. LEXIS 2538, 2000 WL 1396418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-salat-la-2000.