In re Saint-Preux

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Saint-Preux

857 A.2d 1279, 181 N.J. 332, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1075

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-024, concluding that JONATHAN SAINTPREUX of IRVINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JONATHAN SAINT-PREUX is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-024, concluding that JONATHAN SAINTPREUX of IRVINGTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JONATHAN SAINT-PREUX is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Saint-Preux, 857 A.2d 1279, 181 N.J. 332, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1075 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

857 A.2d 1279 (In re Saint-Preux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.