In re Saffert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Saffert

57 A.D.2d 758, 394 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 758 (In re Saffert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Saffert, 57 A.D.2d 758, 394 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered on November 10, 1975, adjudicating the infant a permanently neglected child, terminating appellant’s custodial rights and awarding custody to petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements for the reasons given by the Family Court. While the court below erred in admitting into evidence the entire Brookwood case record pertaining to the infant, as portions thereof were not made contemporaneously with the events described therein or were otherwise deficient, we are firmly convinced that such error was not significant and that, in any event, the result reached herein would have been the same even had such record, or portions thereof, been excluded. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Capozzoli, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered on November 10, 1975, adjudicating the infant a permanently neglected child, terminating appellant’s custodial rights and awarding custody to petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements for the reasons given by the Family Court. While the court below erred in admitting into evidence the entire Brookwood case record pertaining to the infant, as portions thereof were not made contemporaneously with the events described therein or were otherwise deficient, we are firmly convinced that such error was not significant and that, in any event, the result reached herein would have been the same even had such record, or portions thereof, been excluded. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Capozzoli, Lane and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 758, 394 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-saffert-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack