In Re Safen Medical Products, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Safen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D. v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 22, 2023
Docket04-23-00073-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Safen Medical Products, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Safen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D. v. the State of Texas (In Re Safen Medical Products, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Safen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Safen Medical Products, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Safen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00073-CV

IN RE SĀFEN MEDICAL PRODUCTS, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Sāfen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D.

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 22, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 19, 2023, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators also filed a

motion for stay of certain portions of the complained of discovery order pending final resolution

of the petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and this record, this court

concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ Motion for Stay is denied as moot.

Relators’ First Amended Motion to Expedite Consideration of Motion for Stay is denied as moot.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CI-14733, styled B.C. Barnett v. Safen Medical Products, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Safen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D. v. Ann Graham, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Safen Medical Products, LLC, Elizabeth Friedman, Individually, Elizabeth Friedman as Sole Manager of Safen Medical Products, LLC and David J. Friedman, M.D. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-safen-medical-products-llc-elizabeth-friedman-individually-texapp-2023.