In re Saether

492 F.2d 849, 181 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 36, 1974 CCPA LEXIS 195
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedFebruary 28, 1974
DocketPatent Appeal No. 9085
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 492 F.2d 849 (In re Saether) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Saether, 492 F.2d 849, 181 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 36, 1974 CCPA LEXIS 195 (ccpa 1974).

Opinions

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claim 7 in application serial No. 840,890, filed May 26, 1969, for “Elastomeric Platform For Furniture.” We reverse.

FACTS

The invention is an elastomeric platform defined by certain specific physical characteristics rather than ingredients and having a unitary structure which replaces the webbing normally employed to support cushions in furniture such as chairs and couches. The following figure, taken from appellant’s specification, illustrates in a top view the platform in position in a wood furniture frame:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Single Chip Systems Corp. v. Intermec IP Corp.
495 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (S.D. California, 2007)
Pfizer v. Apotex (Formerly Known as Torpharm)
488 F.3d 1377 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.
480 F.3d 1348 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
In re Antonie
559 F.2d 618 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1977)
In re Herz
537 F.2d 549 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1976)
In re Boe
505 F.2d 1297 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 F.2d 849, 181 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 36, 1974 CCPA LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-saether-ccpa-1974.