In re Sachs

169 A. 634, 12 N.J. Misc. 142, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 196
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 9, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 169 A. 634 (In re Sachs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sachs, 169 A. 634, 12 N.J. Misc. 142, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 196 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

The gist of the application is that an adequate qualifying certificate as required by rule 4, and issued in August, 1933', “may be filed as if it were obtained in August, 1930.”

The case seems to differ in no essential particular from “In re K,” 88 N. J. L. 157; 98 Atl. Rep. 668. On the authority of that decision the application must be denied.

It may be well to add that it does not appear that the certificate of August, 1933, has yet been filed. The present rule, dating from 1931, requires such filing before beginning the clerkship; and service prior to such filing may not be counted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re K
98 A. 668 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 A. 634, 12 N.J. Misc. 142, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sachs-nj-1934.