In re Sachs

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Sachs

169 A. 634, 12 N.J. Misc. 142, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 196

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 9, 1934·Published

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

The gist of the application is that an adequate qualifying certificate as required by rule 4, and issued in August, 1933', “may be filed as if it were obtained in August, 1930.”

The case seems to differ in no essential particular from “In re K,” 88 N. J. L. 157; 98 Atl. Rep. 668. On the authority of that decision the application must be denied.

It may be well to add that it does not appear that the certificate of August, 1933, has yet been filed. The present rule, dating from 1931, requires such filing before beginning the clerkship; and service prior to such filing may not be counted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cukiam.

The gist of the application is that an adequate qualifying certificate as required by rule 4, and issued in August, 1933', “may be filed as if it were obtained in August, 1930.”

The case seems to differ in no essential particular from “In re K,” 88 N. J. L. 157; 98 Atl. Rep. 668. On the authority of that decision the application must be denied.

It may be well to add that it does not appear that the certificate of August, 1933, has yet been filed. The present rule, dating from 1931, requires such filing before beginning the clerkship; and service prior to such filing may not be counted.

In re Sachs, 169 A. 634, 12 N.J. Misc. 142, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 196 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

169 A. 634 (In re Sachs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related