In Re Sachs' Estate

236 N.W. 805, 254 Mich. 358
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1931
DocketDocket No. 26, Calendar No. 35,529.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 N.W. 805 (In Re Sachs' Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Sachs' Estate, 236 N.W. 805, 254 Mich. 358 (Mich. 1931).

Opinion

Potter, J.

Henry Sachs of Wyandotte made his last will and testament, January 24, 1929, and died February 22, 1929. His will, on being offered for probate, was objected to by appellant on the grounds of nonexecution, mental incompetency, and undue influence; and, on appellant’s application, certified to the circuit court, where, upon trial, a verdict was directed for proponents. Contestant brings error. The testimony of the scrivener who drew the will, an attorney of 34 years ’ practice, of the subscribing *360 witnesses who were old friends of the testator, and of doctors Albert P. 'Walker, Presley L. Pound, and William H. Honor, all of whom had treated him, is that testator was mentally competent. No one acquainted with him testified to anything indicating either mental incompetency or undue influence. Testator signed the will with proper formalities. The testator was in a hospital in 1928. The hospital records were offered in evidence and properly rejected. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Dabudka, 232 Mich. 36; 22 C. J. p. 902. Their authenticity was not questioned, but their correctness was not proven. One William O. Lawrence, a medical expert, in response to a hypothetical question based upon no facts tending to show testator’s mental incompetency, and who, so far as the record shows, had never known, seen or heard of testator in his lifetime, testified testator was mentally incompetent to make a will. This was not evidence. The direction of a verdict for proponents was correct. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Sharpe, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pounder v. Harper Woods Board of Education
250 N.W.2d 504 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 N.W. 805, 254 Mich. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sachs-estate-mich-1931.