In re S. R. L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re S. R. L.

264 A.D.2d 636, 695 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9283

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 636 (In re S. R. L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re S. R. L., 264 A.D.2d 636, 695 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about December 29, 1997, which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner’s application for custody of the parties’ child and granted respondent’s cross petition for custody, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While both parties are fit and loving parents, based upon our consideration of the totality of the circumstances and our weighing of the various factors particularly relevant to determining the instant custody petitions (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 172), we agree with the Family Court that it would be in the child’s best interests (supra) for custody to be awarded solely to respondent-father with liberal visitation to petitioner-mother. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Mazza-relli, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about December 29, 1997, which, after a hearing, dismissed petitioner’s application for custody of the parties’ child and granted respondent’s cross petition for custody, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While both parties are fit and loving parents, based upon our consideration of the totality of the circumstances and our weighing of the various factors particularly relevant to determining the instant custody petitions (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 172), we agree with the Family Court that it would be in the child’s best interests (supra) for custody to be awarded solely to respondent-father with liberal visitation to petitioner-mother. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Tom, Mazza-relli, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 636, 695 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-s-r-l-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack